Showing 3434 Documents for "securities"
Filter by
Sort by
- MAS
- Guidelines
Last revised date:
- officer or head of information security, who is principally responsible for the information security strategy and programme of the financial institution, including but not limited to information security policies and procedures to safeguard information assets, information security controls
- (1)(i) of the Second Schedule to the Securities and Futures (Licensing and Conduct 21 -------- Guidelines on Individual Accountability and Conduct of Business) Regulations, the functions involving the regulated activity of fund management as defined in the Second Schedule of the Securities and
- Futures Act, and any other material function; (ix) in relation to an approved trustee under the Securities and Futures Act, the functions involving acting as a trustee for collective investment schemes which are authorised under the Securities and Futures Act and constituted as unit trusts
- PDPC
- Public Consultations
Last revised date:
- As such, the concept of personal data is pertinent to FIs, given that they are governed by sectoral regulations from the MAS, as well as statutory regulations such as the Securities and Futures Act (the “SFA”)9 and the Banking Act (the “BA”).10
- of Network and Information Systems Directive, issued 8 August 2017. 112 Section 3, Consultation by the UK Government to implement the Security of Network and Information Systems Directive, United Kingdom. 113 Directive on Security of Network and Information Systems, adopted by the European Parliament
- “Draft Cybersecurity Bill” (“Draft Bill”)2 which was issued by the Ministry of Communications and Information (“MCI”) and the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (“CSA”) on 10 July 2017; c.
- MAS
- Media Releases
Last revised date:
- [Please see Securities and Futures (Offers of Investments) (CIS) Regulations 2002 Fifth Schedule paragraph 3] .
- Oria Capital Ltd is licensed under the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Ordinance for advising on securities and asset management. 3 Restricted schemes offered only to sophisticated investors are not subject to the investment guidelines and other requirements in the Code on Collective Investment Schemes
- In Singapore, these two restricted schemes may be offered to sophisticated investors only. 3 MAS suspended the recognition of these two schemes on 18 June 2004, after Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission issued a restriction notice on 15 June 2004 to prohibit the manager of the schemes, Charles
- MAS
- Enforcement Actions
Last revised date:
- security token and UOB ATM card to him.
- The orders took effect from 29 October 2020. 17-year POs against Mr Lu Chor Sheng 3 Mr Lu is prohibited for a period of 17 years from performing any regulated activity under the Securities and Futures Act (SFA) and from providing any financial advisory service under the Financial Advisers Act (FAA)
- Mr Lu was sentenced to 100 months’ imprisonment. 9-year POs against Mr Tan Swee Thiam Timothy 7 Mr Tan is prohibited for a period of nine years from performing any regulated activity under the Securities and Futures Act (SFA) and from providing any financial advisory service under the Financial Advisers
- MAS
- Forms and Templates
Last revised date:
- and Futures Act; and (b) Part 3 of the Securities and Futures (Organised Markets) Regulations 2018 Revised 10 October 2018 -------- II DECLARATION We are aware that sections 329(3) and (4) of the Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289) provide as follows: 1.
- Markets - Form 5 Application for change in status SECURITIES AND FUTURES ACT (CAP. 289) SECTION 8(3)(a) APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN STATUS FORM 5 Explanatory Notes 1. Please read the explanatory notes and questions carefully before completing the form. 2.
- NAME OF APPLICANT Application is hereby made for change in status under section 11(1) of the Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289) from an approved exchange to a recognised market operator; or a recognised market operator to an approved exchange 1.
- MAS
- Forms and Templates
Last revised date:
- SECURITIES AND FUTURES ACT (CAP. 289) FORM 5 SECURITIES AND FUTURES (FINANCIAL BENCHMARKS) REGULATIONS 2018 REGULATION 22 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PARTICULARS FOR AUTHORISED, EXEMPT OR DESIGNATED BENCHMARK SUBMITTERS Explanatory Notes 1.
- NOTIFICATION OF CESSATION OF PROVIDING INFORMATION TO A DESIGNATED BENCHMARK Answer this section only if making a notification pursuant to Section 123ZP(a) of the Securities and Futures Act. Only applicable for an authorised or exempt benchmark submitter. 1.
- A notification, pursuant to Section 123ZP(b) of the Securities and Futures Act, of a change in any matter records of which are required by section 123ZQ(1) to be kept in relation to the benchmark submitter. (Please proceed to answer Sections IV and V of this Form.) III.
- MAS
- Notices
Last revised date:
- and Futures Act (Cap. 289) (SFA).
- PDPC
- Commission's Decisions
Last revised date:
- [2019] SGPDPC 40 responsible for making reasonable security arrangements to protect the Personal Data. 10.
- However, in practice résumés which were uploaded to the Website were stored in a folder (“the Folder”) on the Website’s server which was not secured by access controls.
- Hence, while the Web Host had performed some security reviews on the Website, they had not been engaged to advise on or implement measures to protect the personal data stored in the Folder. 8.
- PDPC
- Commission's Decisions
Last revised date:
- Third, Singtel conducted annual on-site security reviews of Tech Mahindra’s off- site premises as part of its governance process and required Tech Mahindra to confirm its compliance with various security protocols.
- First, Singtel had put in place a contract requiring Tech Mahindra to comply with the PDPA, adhere to all of Singtel’s access and security policies, processes and directions, and to ensure that its employees are trained to comply with all data protection laws and security measures before
- In this case, the Commission finds Singtel to have complied with its obligation under Section 24 of the PDPA to put in place reasonable security arrangements to protect personal data. Page 3 of 6 -------- 14.
- PDPC
- Commission's Decisions
Last revised date:
- It is inexcusable for an established organisation like COURTS to neglect its obligations to put in place reasonable security arrangements to protect the Personal Data Sets.
- In the circumstances, the customer’s email address was the sole login credential as the “Name” field did not serve any security purpose; access to the Guest Checkout System was not conditional on linking the input entered into the “Name” field with the customer’s email address.
- Although the Website and Guest Checkout Page were launched before the PDPA came into force, COURTS failed to review their system design or process flow, or implement any internal security policies in relation to data protection for the Website after the PDPA came