Showing 3434 Documents for "securities"

Filter by
Sort by

    • MAS
    • Consultations

    Last revised date:

    • Streamlined admission requirements for RMO Tier 3 Tier 3 RMOs are required to meet the baseline regulatory requirements5 under 3.2 the Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289) (SFA) and Securities and Futures (Markets) Regulations 2005 (SF(M)R).
    • At the minimum, this will entail a sub-set of requirements under the MAS Guidelines on Technology Risk Management and Guidelines on Outsourcing which will include (i) safeguarding of user confidentiality; (ii) business contingency planning; and (iii) IT security controls, e.g. security monitoring
    • Monetary Authority of Singapore 11 -------- CONSULTATION PAPER ON REVIEW OF THE RECOGNISED MARKET OPERATORS REGIME 22 MAY 2018 Additional requirements for Tier 1 RMOs that intend to allow listing of securities 4.7 Some Tier 1 RMOs may also allow issuers to list securities for trading
    • MAS
    • Enforcement Actions

    Last revised date:

    • and Futures Act (SFA).
    • a prohibition order against a person who has been convicted of an offence under the SFA
    • They are also prohibited from taking part in the management, acting as a director or becoming a substantial shareholder of any capital markets services firm under the SFA The POs against the three individuals were issued under Section 101A(1)(e) of the SFA. . 3    The three individuals had engaged in
    • MAS
    • Letters to Editor

    Last revised date:

    • Achieving a Robust and Vibrant Securities Market The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Singapore Exchange (SGX) have over the past year introduced several new measures to strengthen the securities market.
    • A well-functioning securities market is a shared responsibility. The regulator, the exchanges, the industry, and investor associations, should work together to co-create a fair and efficient securities market that engenders confidence and trust.
    • But a well-functioning securities market should also serve as a platform for companies in different phases of growth to list and raise capital as long as they meet the requirements.
    • PDPC
    • Commission's Decisions

    Last revised date:

    • It therefore did not have an overall picture of its security needs in relation to the website. 12 The failure to implement and enforce reasonable password security requirements on the senior moderator accounts and to conduct security testing to acquire knowledge of the Forum websites security
    • password history setting) but did not compel them to do so. 11 Finally, the Organisation did not perform any security testing of the Forum website.
    • A financial penalty of $26,000 was imposed on SPH Magazines for failing to put in place reasonable security arrangements to prevent the unauthorised access of personal data of members of HardwareZone forum site. Click here to find out more.
    • MAS
    • Media Releases

    Last revised date:

    • Defer Payment of Principal on Secured SME Loans 14 SMEs may opt to defer principal payments on their secured term loans up to 31 December 2020, subject to banks’ and finance companies’ assessment of the quality of the SMEs’ security.
    • The package only applies to fully secured term loans, but banks and finance companies may extend the relief to partially secured term loans at their own initiative.
    • Fully secured would refer to all collateral that the bank and finance company currently accepts for SME term loans.
    • MAS
    • Notices

    Last revised date:

    • , units in a collective investment scheme or securities-based derivatives contracts securities under the Securities and Futures Act (Cap 289). 2.1.5 S$ credit facilities include loans, contingent credit lines and foreign exchange swaps involving a sale of S$ to a non-resident financial institution
    • , units in a collective investment scheme or -------- Notice on Lending of Singapore Dollar to Non-Resident Financial Institutions 3 securities-based derivatives contracts under the Securities and Futures Act (Cap 289).; and [MAS Notice 816 (Amendment) 2021] 2.1.5 S$ credit facilities
    • .; [MAS Notice 816 (Amendment) 2021] 2.1.4 Residents means: (a) (b) companies which are at least 50% owned by Singapore citizens; or the following financial institutions in Singapore which are subject to this notice, or MAS Notices 109, 757, 816, 1105 or SFA 04-N04: (
    • MAS
    • Notices

    Last revised date:

    • and Futures Act 2001 (SFA) (Cap. 289).
    • Persons exempted under section 99(1)(h) of the SFA Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289) read with paragraph 7(1)(b) of the Second Schedule to the Securities and Futures (Licensing and Conduct of Business) Regulations.
    • [MAS Notice SFA03AA-N01 (Amendment) 2022] Holders of a capital markets services licence under section 82 of the SFA Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289).
    • MAS
    • Annual Reports

    Last revised date:

    • risk Management control and governance Process information Security Security and Fire Safety MAS received the national Safety and Security Watch group Award for the fourth time, in recognition of our proactive efforts to ensure safety and security at our premises.
    • RObUST FINANCIAL CENTRE Amendments to the Securities and Futures Act The wide-ranging amendments to the Securities and Futures Act (SFA) were made along four key areas: enhancing regulatory safeguards for investors, by bringing certain non-conventional investment products within MAS regulatory
    • The three individuals had exploited over 180 trading accounts to manipulate the market for three securities counters.
    • PDPC
    • Commission's Decisions

    Last revised date:

    • Ltd. [2019] SGPDPC 27 at [26] 6 -------- Vendor of the requirement to secure personal data collected through the Form.
    • According to the Organisation, it believed that the password protection to the administrative panel was secure enough.
    • A financial penalty of $10,000 was imposed on MDIS Corporation for failing to put in place reasonable security arrangements to protect the personal data of individuals on its website.
    • PDPC
    • Commission's Decisions

    Last revised date:

    • A financial penalty of $12,500 was imposed on PINC for failing to put in place reasonable security arrangements to protect the personal data in its possession.
    • In a similar vein, the Organisation here has failed to adopt adequate security measures when it simply allowed its employees to retain a copy of the Staging Database on their own personal devices, without putting any thought to the security measures that ought to be implemented to
    • employees, i.e. the developers, to store local copies of the Staging Database in their own personal devices, without implementing any additional security requirements.