Showing 3434 Documents for "securities"

Filter by
Sort by

    • PDPC
    • Commission's Decisions

    Last revised date:

    • Nonetheless, as explained above, the onus remained on the Organisation to put in place adequate security measures such as regular IT system maintenance, patches and periodic security reviews. 6.
    • Investigations revealed that the Organisation did not implement adequate administrative and technical security arrangements. First, the Organisation failed to conduct or schedule any software updates, maintenance and/or security review before the Incident.
    • A financial penalty of $2,000 was imposed on Southaven Boutique for failing to put in place reasonable security arrangement to prevent the unauthorised access of its customers' personal data in its Point-Of-Sale system server.
    • MAS
    • Exemptions

    Last revised date:

    • , read with Section 337(3) and 337(4) of the SFA.
    • View exemptions issued under section 337(2) of the Securities and Futures Act for the period from 1 April 2020 to 30 June 2020.
    • Issue Date: 27 July 2020 EXEMPTIONS ISSUED PURSUANT TO SECTION 337(2) OF THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ACT (CAP. 289) (SFA) For the period from 1 April 2020 to 30 June 2020 S/N Exemption granted Exemption provision No. of exemptions provided Date of exemption granted Description
    • PDPC
    • Public Consultations

    Last revised date:

    • Data Loss in Security Breach In the Internet Security Threat Report published by Symantec in April 2012, it was reported that 232 million identities were stolen as a result of security breaches in 2011. On average, each breach had resulted in the loss of 1.1 million identities.
    • This increases the impact of a security breach in terms of the data lost, as well as the risk of the data being used accidentally in breach of the PDPA.
    • , storage and systems management solutions to help our customers – from consumers and small businesses to the largest global organizations – secure and manage their information and identities independent of device.
    • PDPC
    • Public Consultations

    Last revised date:

    • Response: Paragraph 2.49(d) states that “Security of data: minimum standards to ensure the protection of data during transmission and the integrity and security of participating systems.” I am concerned with the “minimum standards” statement.
    • “Innocent Code: A Security Wake-Up Call for Web Programmers”. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 91–92. [6] Gilbert Henri, Helena Handschuh (2003). "Security Analysis of SHA-256 and Sisters". Selected Areas in Cryptography, pp175–193 [7] Ferguson, Niels; Schneier, Bruce (2003).
    • It is notable that the editors stated that ‘Each organisation should adopt security arrangements that are reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances...’ [4, pp186].
    • MAS
    • Circulars

    Last revised date:

    • , CIS recognised pursuant to section 287 of the SFA, CIS registered pursuant to section 305 of the SFA, and CIS that fall within the specified exemptions under sections 302B, 302C, and 304 of the SFA.
    • Restricted CIS), and CIS that fall within the specified exemptions under sections 302B, 302C, and 304 of the SFA (i.e.
    • CMI 13/2021 31 May 2021 To: Chief Executive Officers of all Capital Markets Services Licence Holders for the Regulated Activity of Fund Management, and Registered Fund Management Companies under the Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289) (SFA) Dear Sir/Madam
    • MAS
    • Speeches

    Last revised date:

    • This new security is called Reserves Management Government Securities, or RMGS.
    • New type of Government security to facilitate continued transfers of OFR 12.
    • Mr Speaker Sir, I beg to move. *** Resources: FAQs on Reserves Management Government Securities
    • PDPC
    • Commission's Decisions

    Last revised date:

    • In some notification letters, additional information on the securities owned by the -------- Re Central Depository (Pte) Limited & Anor [2019] SGPDPC 24 individual (eg name of security and total amount of dividends or distribution for the security) was also disclosed.
    • Toppan Security Printing Pte Ltd (“TSP”) was engaged by CDP to carry out secure printing and dispatch of documents, including notification letters of CDP’s customers.
    • The type of data that correspond to each of the labels is as follows: Label Type of data D00001 name of the security. D00002 account number, account holder name and mailing address D00004 information on credits to the account for the security.
    • PDPC
    • Commission's Decisions

    Last revised date:

    • In some notification letters, additional information on the securities owned by the individual (eg name of security and total amount of dividends or distribution for the security) was also disclosed.
    • Toppan Security Printing Pte Ltd (“TSP”) was engaged by CDP to carry out secure printing and dispatch of documents, including notification letters of CDP’s customers.
    • The type of data that correspond to each of the labels is as follows: Label Type of data D00001 name of the security. D00002 account number, account holder name and mailing address D00004 information on credits to the account for the security.
    • MAS
    • Consultations

    Last revised date:

    • A holder should mitigate security risks through the implementation 2.2.4 of a safe and robust security risk management framework that will be able to actively identify, assess, reduce and monitor security risk.
    • Security risk 2.2.3 Security risks need to be appropriately addressed, especially for an SVF scheme that is heavily dependent on electronic or network systems.
    • Security vulnerabilities in these systems can pose a significant threat to the integrity of the entire scheme. Inadequate management of security vulnerabilities may give rise to the risk of fraud, such as counterfeiting.
    • MAS
    • Enforcement Actions

    Last revised date:

    • and Futures Act (SFA); and (ii) providing any financial advisory services, and taking part in the management, acting as a director or becoming a substantial shareholder of any financial advisory firm under the Financial Advisers Act (FAA). 2   Mr Hirubalan was a representative of OCBC Securities Private
    • To protect consumers from fraudulent and dishonest behaviour by representatives, MAS will not hesitate to bar any individuals who do not meet fit and proper criteria from the financial industry.” *** Notes to Editor (A) Section 201(b) of the SFA Under section 201(b) of the SFA, no person shall, directly
    • On 24 June 2016, Mr Hirubalan was convicted of charges under section 201(b) of the SFA and section 406 of the Penal Code for these offences.